Innovators usually make
bad businessmen. They get enamored by the product that they may ignore the ecosystem.
The product that works wonderfully in sterile conditions of a lab has to be
transposed on to the rugged rough and tumble of everyday life and unless one
can simulate the innovation in the open, it will be a difficult business
proposition. This is a stereotypical view about innovations. So, are good
businessmen are usually bad innovators? Not necessarily. They could be great
innovators, introducing new products and moving the frontiers of the business. But
why do great innovations fail?
Welcome to the different
world of highly competitive business corporations, identifying a niche customer
need, investing in research, developing a scalable product and then failing in
the market. What could businesses learn from failures? Is it okay not to be a
pioneer? Ron Adner’s book The Wide Lens is a refreshingly different business
book. It builds a theory from successful innovations and [mostly] failed
businesses. The essential argument that Adner provides is that if we are in the
business, we are in an ecosystem and not working in isolation. It is not just
about carrying out research on Run-Flat tyres developed my Michelin. The
product was developed, it was technically superior and possibly a game changer
in the market place. Michelin protected itself with a fortress of patents, but
unless there was an entire ecosystem of service stations that could service
such a concept, automobile manufacturers who saw merit in the concept and
customers willing to experiment with it, it was never going to succeed.
Adner discusses and
argues for a Wide Lens approach for innovation. It is an approach fraught with
risks because innovations are usually shrouded in secrecy. Bit if the business
does not take the ecosystem into consideration, if the external environment is
not equipped to support the product, it will fail. Therefore one needs to look
at co-innovation, understanding the adopton chain risk and looking at the internal
and external ecosystem.
The entire book is
written in a delightful style. Adner uses several examples to talk about how
innovation should be aligned with the understanding of the final customer
experience. How does one overcome the innovators’ blind spot? Nokia saw the
opportunity to grow in the mobile phone market and the next big thing was 3G.
The first challenge was to build the product; next was to get component
suppliers to co-create the product. But what is the use of launching a Ferrari
in a place that has no roads? Adner asks this question aptly. When Nokia launched
a 3G phone, were the telcos ready to launch the service with adequate spectrum?
And were the apps that make a 3G phone a delight ready? Did it provide a
superior customer experience? In unpeeling this aspect, we that the success of
an innovative product hinges upon so many others also rising up to the situation
and delivering in their respective niche areas.
Usually books on
innovation talk about the process of nurturing ideas, getting innovation into
the DNA of a business [as in 3M] and how some companies keep launching new killer
products. When we talk innovation in this age, it is difficult to ignore Apple
and Steve Jobs. Adner analyses Apple and its products extensively and provides
an explanation to its success using the wide lens framework.
Adner explains how Apple
mostly got its timing right, whether it was i-Pod which came in much after many
MP3 players, or iPhone which also was a late smart phone to be launched. Both
these products represented a timing that was smart and features that the
ecosystem allowed the consumer to use. The setting up of iTunes provided easy
content for iPod and iPhone was more of moving the loyal iPod customers into
the mobile phone market by providing additional features. While Apple did
unconventional things like tightly controlling the apps as well as locking the
phone with a single service provider, Adner sees a greater pattern in that
strategy of differentiation, targeted voice and data plans and uniqueness that
the carrier could provide exclusively for Apple owners.
While Adner talks about
a series of failures because the companies did not see the ecosystem [Sony’s
e-reader, Philips HDTV, the current 3DTVs, Insulin inhalers etc] he also
provides a dissection of Apple neatly fitted into his wide lens framework. The
most impressive chapters in the book is the wide lens framework for an Electric
Vehicle [EV]. He does a complete analysis of the ecosystem and breaks it up
into neat parts that need to be fixed. He then provides a framework of how Better
Place in Israel is addressing these issues in launching the EV. This is
instructive, and only time will tell whether Adner’s framework had captured all
the elements of success or whether there were some elements that were left out.
It is one thing to analyse failures, but quite another to predict success.
Hope Adner’s book is not
ahead of its time [the usual reason provided for commercial failures of
business innovations] and does well.
The Wide Lens
A New Strategy for Innovation
Ron Adner
Portfolio/Penguin
pp.278.
1 comment:
Good blog! Thanks for sharing the valuable information with us,It is very helpful in digital marketing. For more information about "reason-behind-failure-of-online-business
Post a Comment